Summary
In Oregon has historically seen distinctions between the treatment of police and non-police bargaining units but has recently made statutory changes to address some of those issues.
- Oversight. In 2023, Oregon enacted a change to its public sector collective bargaining statute exempting from bargaining an oversight system enacted by popular vote.
- Statutory Scope. Oregon’s statute provides a broader scope of bargaining for police in other areas such as safety issues
- Oversight and Work Transfer Decisions. Before 2023, Oregon’s Employment Relations Board set a more favorable standard for bargaining oversight and work transfers from police bargaining units.
- Impasse Procedures. Oregon requires interest arbitration to resolve bargaining impasses for police units but not for any other units.
- Expedited Bargaining. Where disputes arise during the term of the contract, Oregon requires the parties to engage in a shortened bargaining process. For police that process culminates in interest arbitration; for everyone else, the employer may implement its last offer before impasse was reached.
- LEOBOR. Oregon has an Law Enforcement Bill of Rights that codifies investigation processes that are must be bargained by every other unit.
Recommended Citation
Ford, Elizabeth, "Oregon" (2026). Thin Blue Advantage: Police Exceptionalism and the Two-Tier System of Public Sector Collective Bargaining. 20.
https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/uncommonlaw/20
COinS