Summary
In New York there are several areas of difference in the treatment of police and non-police collective bargaining. They include the following:
- Fragmentation. New York City has its own, separate system for regulating collective bargaining, which is not included in this analysis.
- Impasse Process. When an impasse in bargaining is reached, police have access to binding interest arbitration. Non-police do not.
- Disciplinary Decisions. New York law provides that decisions on the discipline of police employee are excluded from bargaining. The same is not true for non-police employees.
- Investigation and Oversight. The process for imposing discipline, and surveillance are more often frequently challenged and found to be mandatory subjects of bargaining in the police context.
- Subcontracting and Skimming. Reassignment of duties and subcontracting cases are internally inconsistent providing no discernable patterns.
- Duties. PERB is slightly more likely to find a change of duties to be mandatorily bargainable for police than non-police.
Recommended Citation
Ford, Elizabeth, "New York" (2025). Uncommon Law. 17.
https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/uncommonlaw/17
COinS