Document Type
Article
Abstract
This article draws upon the experiences of the Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization at Yale Law School to argue that, while litigation has a place in addressing both the problem of homelessness and the problems of the homeless, it must be placed within a broader context and supplemented by other, non-litigious, legal activity. Using as an example a lawsuit brought on behalf of homeless families in Connecticut, this article makes four observations which support the conclusion that litigation, used alone, is an ineffective means of addressing the problem of homelessness.
Recommended Citation
Ronald Slye,
Community Institution Building: A Response to the Limits of Litigation in Addressing the Problem of Homelessness, 36 VILL. L. REV. 1035
(1991).
https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty/439