Abstract
Part I of this Note provides background information about the major controversies related to GM foods, including the debate about whether such foods should be labeled, and the history of GMO labeling laws in the United States. Part II compares S. 764 with H.R. 1599 and explains why a national mandatory labeling approach is superior to the voluntary labeling approach advocated by the House. Part III discusses the potential drawbacks and effect of S. 764 and finally concludes that the rulemaking process that will follow may create controversies and litigation.
Recommended Citation
Nan Feng, The Recent Enactment of National Mandatory GMO Labeling Law: Superior to a Voluntary Labeling Scheme But Unlikely to End the Labeling Controversy, 40 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 821 (2017).
