Abstract
This Article begins with an overview of the GMA. It then proceeds with a summary of recent case law under the Takings Clause and substantive due process doctrine. After laying this groundwork, this Article focuses on four particular areas of growth management control and explores how local legislation implementing these areas of control would be analyzed under the Takings Clause and substantive due process. These four areas of land use regulation include: critical area protections, resource land designations, development phasing requirements for concurrency and urban growth areas, and impact fees for public facilities and services. This Article then concludes with several brief observations as to measures that may be taken to protect growth management legislation from takings and substantive due process challenges.
Recommended Citation
Jeffrey M. Eustis, Between Scylla and Charybdis: Growth Management Act Implementation That Avoids Takings and Substantive Due Process Limitations, 16 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 1181 (1993).
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Legislation Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons
