•  
  •  
 

Abstract

In 1976, Congress passed the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) to curtail the growing problem of disposing of hazardous waste and toxic substances generally. Decades prior, Congress established the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) to hold the federal Government liable for tortious conduct the same way a private citizen would be. The federal government assumed the responsibility to ensure the wellbeing of Native Nations (“NN”). This is commonly referred to the “Trust Doctrine.” This duty stems from the settlement of Native American lands, and a recognition of the treaties entered into by the United States with a “moral [obligation] of the highest responsibility and trust” towards NNs. Although often necessary to encourage government action, the Discretionary Function Exception (“DFE”) to the FTCA, has substantially prevented private citizens from gaining redress for harms from toxic torts caused by the federal government. Like the DFE, the Snyder Act, 25 U.S.C. § 13 allows the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior for dealing with Indian Affairs. This note looks at strategies for the use of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), The Snyder Act, and the Trust Doctrine to overcome the DFE for NN’s looking for ways to successfully bring FTCA claims against the government for Agency actions that are unacceptable for the environment and public health and safety.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.