Abstract
Advocates for the “rights of nature” seek recognition of legal rights for natural elements such as mountains, rivers, and non-human species as a means of protecting the environment. In the United States, Tribal Nations have been at the forefront of this nascent movement. In a 2022 Washington state case, the Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe sued the City of Seattle, alleging that the City’s hydroelectric dams on the Skagit River infringe upon the rights of salmon. Those rights, they claim, include the salmon’s rights to exist, flourish, regenerate, and evolve. The case, known as Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. City of Seattle, was eventually dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and thus was never adjudicated on the merits. However, the case offers important lessons that can and should inform future rights of nature actions.
Recommended Citation
Harry S. Katz,
Advancing the Rights of Nature: Lessons from Sauk-Suiattle v. City of Seattle,
14 Am. Indian L.J.
(2026).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/ailj/vol14/iss1/5
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Gaming Law Commons, Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Transnational Law Commons, Water Law Commons