This Note will review briefly the history of the exclusionary rule under fourth amendment jurisprudence, with special emphasis given to the purposes the rule has traditionally been thought to serve. The significance of the Leon decision then will be examined in light of the emergence in Washington of an interpretation of article I, section 7 that diverges from the Supreme Court's interpretations of the fourth amendment. This Note will conclude by discussing how article I, section 7 continues to embody the several purposes traditionally served by the exclusionary rule.
Catherine Cruikshank, Dismantling the Exclusionary Rule: United States v. Leon and the Courts of Washington—Should Good Faith Excuse Bad Acts?, 9 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 415 (1986).